SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 6

M.Y.EQBAL
Inderadeo Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Sujit Narayan Prasad, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: SC-I

ORDER

M.Y. Eqbal, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel.

2. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the notice dated 24.12.2001 which was communicated to the petitioner on.7.10.2001, whereby the petitioner has been called upon to show cause as to why his promotion to the post of Technical Assistant be not cancelled and further for a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to perform his duty to the post of Technical Assistant.

3. Petitioner's case is that he was appointed as casual labour on 10.6.1976 in Milk Supply-cum-Dairy Firm, Hotwar, Ranchi. In the year 1978 he was taken into the service of Grade-IV employee. It is alleged that in the year 1986 the Departmental Promotion Committee held its meeting for promotion to the post of Technical Assistant from Grade-IV post. Petitioner also appeared before the Selection Committee and after competing in the interview, he was given promotion to the post of Technical Assistant vide order dated 2.7.1986. Since the date of promotion he has been discharging his duties as Technical Assistant. It is, therefore, contended that the show cause no





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top