SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 199

M.Y.EQBAL, DILIP KUMAR SINHA
Oriental Insurance – Appellant
Versus
Manorama Devi – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard the counsel for the parties in the limitation matter. The delay is of 18 days which has been sufficiently explained.

2. Hence, IA is allowed and the delay in filing the appeals is condoned. We have heard the counsel for the parties on the merit of the appeal aso. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 15.6.2005 passed by Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranchi in Compensation Case No. 139/97 whereby the Tribunal has awarded compensation for the death of one Mithu Sao who died in an accident caused by Bus No. BR-13P-1510 on 2.6.1997. The claimants-respondents are the widow, minor sons and daughters. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant assailed the impugned order on the ground that when a person driving the bus was not having valid driving licence, the appellant-Insurance Company has no liability.

3. The Tribunal although took notice of the fact that the owner failed to prove the driving licence, it held that no evidence was led by the Insurance Company that the owner of the vehicle had knowledge about the fact that the driver had defective driving licence. The Tribunal further held that in such circumstance the Insurance Company canno




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top