Amareshwar Sahay, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner had moved this Court earlier in WPC No. 224/2004 making a grievance that he being the lowest bidder was issue work order for supplying two lifts of OTIS make by the Director, State Institute of Rural Development but subsequently by letter dated 29.12.2006, the Deputy Director of the said Institute cancelled the work order without any notice or opportunity to explain the allegations made against the petitioner and. therefore, it was against the principle of natural justice.

3. The said writ petition was allowed by order dated 26.2.2007 only on the ground that the work order was cancelled in violation of principle of natural justice and it was observed that if the respondents intend to proceed against the petitioner they may do so in accordance with the procedure established by law after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4. Thereafter, it appears that a notice was issued to the petitioner by the respondents State Institute of Rural Development to show cause as to why the work order given to him be not cancelled and, thereafter, on compliance of the principle of natural justice as directed by this Cour