SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Jhk) 330

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Ajit Kumar Sinha, J.
Dr. Basudeo Singh – Appellants.
Vs.
Ranchi University and Ors. – Respondent
Decided On : 03.03.2009

The lack of legal or vested right to claim seniority prior to the date of joining.

Headnote:

Seniority Dispute - Department of History - Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, Section 35(3) - The court discussed the seniority dispute in the Department of History and the validity of statutes regarding the appointment of teachers and officers. The court highlighted the requirement for temporary teachers to have put in at least 12 months of continuous service for seniority consideration and emphasized the lack of legal or vested right to claim seniority prior to the date of joining.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought various reliefs related to seniority and promotions in the Department of History, citing discrepancies in notifications and alleging illegal and arbitrary actions by the respondents.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's claim to seniority prior to his date of joining was illegal and unsustainable, dismissing the writ petition for being devoid of merit.

Issues: Seniority dispute, legality of promotions, and confirmation of respondents 6 and 7 to the post of Reader and University Professor.

Ratio Decidendi: The requirement for temporary teachers to have put in at least 12 months of continuous service for seniority consideration and the lack of legal or vested right to claim seniority prior to the date of joining.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed for being devoid of merit.

ORDER

Ajit Kumar Sinha, J.

1. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:

1. Rule NISI for issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ of or in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents (Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in particular) to immediately and forthwith make necessary corrections and/or amendments in the notification in so far as it relates to the Department of History issued on 29.5.1997 under the seal and signature of the respondent No. 3 purporting to be under the orders of the respondent No. 2 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been confirmed at a date later than the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and whereby the petitioner has further been made junior to them,

2. Rule NISI for issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ of or in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents (Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in particular) to immediately and forthwith issue a notification placing the petitioner at Sl. No. 4 to which he is lawfully and legally entitled as per the system of Roster specified in Statute No. V(b) of the Statutes dated 25.11.1980 which received and assent of the Chancellor on 19.11.1980,

3. Rule NISI for issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ of or in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents (Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in particular) to immediately and forthwith declare the petitioner as senior to the respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

4. For quashing the Notification dated 17.5.1996 and 11.7.1997 issued by the respondent No. 3 in so far as it relates to the respondent No. 6 whereby and whereunder he was given promotion to the post of Reader and University Professor with effect from 3. 1.1987 and 3.1.1995 respectively illegally and contrary to the Statute,

5. For quashing the Notification dated 24.2.1998 (a copy of which is not available with the petitioner because it was issued in a very secretive manner) and dated 4.7.1998 in so far as it relates to the respondent No. 7 whereby and whereunder, he was given promotion to the post of Reader and University Professor with effect from 7.7.1982 and 8.4.1987 respectively illegally and contrary to the Statute,

6. For a writ of mandamus and/or order and/or declaration declaring that the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in promoting and subsequently confirming the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 to the post of Reader and University Professor are illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Section 35(3) of the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976.

7. Rule NISI for issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ of or in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to show-cause before this Hon'ble Court as to how they could confirm the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 on the post of Reader and University Professor without taking into consideration that such post of a Reader or a University Professor is not sanctioned in the University and without taking into consideration that their promotion to these posts were on the basis of time bound promotion statutes which are mere upgradation and are not like appointment of direct recruit,

8. Rule NISI for issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ of or in the nature of a writ of certiorari commanding upon the respondents to certify and show-cause as to why the notifications is so far as it relates to the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 confirming them on the post of Reader and University Professor be not quashed and set aside by this Hon'ble Court as they are contrary to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in [1995]3SCR572 paragraph 41,

9. Consequently a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to immediately initiate action under Section 35(3) of the aforesaid Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 and terminate the aforesaid promotions and confirmations of the respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

2. The main contention raised by the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been placed below respondent No. 6 whereas his confirmation is from 4.12.1981








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top