SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Jhk) 1134

DILIP KUMAR SINHA
Ramesh Kumar Bajaj @ Ramesh Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.K. Sinha, J.

1. The petitioners have invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court for the quashment of the order dated 26.05.2006 passed by the S.D.J.M., Godda in P.C.R. No. 627 of 2002 corresponding to T.R. No. 1169 of 2006 by an appropriate writ/order/directions.

2. The brief fact of the case giving rise to the writ petition was that the Respondent No. 2 (Raj Kishore Jha) had presented a complaint vide P.C.R. No. 474/99 in the Court of C.J.M., Godda against both the petitioners Ramesh Kumar Bajaj @ Ramesh Bajaj & Raman Kumar Sah @ Raman Kumar stating inter alia that he was the owner of Mahindra Commander Jeep No. BR 12-4494 having all relevant documents of the said jeep in his name. On 12.05.1999 the petitioner No. 1 Ramesh Kumar Bajaj @ Ramesh Bajaj took the jeep of the complainant on hire from the complainant at the rate of Rs. 400/- per day. It was alleged that whenever the complainant Respondent No. 2 (Raj Kishore Jha) used to demand the freight of his jeep that was under use and possession of the petitioner No. 1 (Ramesh Kumar Bajaj @ Ramesh Bajaj) on hire, the latter rest assured that he would make payment sooner and asked that he needed the vehicle for























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top