DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, BHAGWATI PRASAD
Court on its own motion – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. Court on its own motion takes notice to the newspaper report of 'Dainik Bhaskar' (page no. 2) and also the report published in its 'D.B. Star' dated 28th February, 2011 that there are number of buildings in the city, which have not submitted Completion Certificate to the local authorities and consequently no occupancy certificates have been issued by the local authorities. Furthermore, there are buildings, which have been constructed even without passing of the maps from the concerned authority. This has also been brought to our notice that in certain cases, maps have been sanctioned by the authorities against the laws. This is also one of the concerns which have been expressed that such wrongly constructed buildings are in occupation. This all requires a serious note to be taken by this Court.
2. A suo motu action is initiated against the erring authorities and notice is issued to the State of Jharkhand, R.R.D.A. and Ranchi Municipal Corporation to clarify the following questions:
1. How many building plans have been sanctioned by the R.R.D.A/R.M.C in accordance with its building byelaws in the last ten years?
2. How many completion certificates have been submitted by lice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.