SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 80

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
R.K. Merathia, J.
Ravi Hi-tech Ltd. – Appellants.
Vs.
B.I.F.R. and Ors. – Respondent
C.P. No. 3 of 2003
Decided On : 04.02.2011

The court's decision was influenced by the principle of allowing the withdrawal of the interlocutory application with liberty for the BSFC to take action as permissible under the law, and making decisions based on the valuation reports for the properties.

Headnote:

Interlocutory Application - Dismissal with Liberty - Valuation Report

Fact of the Case:

The court considered an interlocutory application filed by BSFC for action against the Ex-Director/other persons responsible for removing mortgaged plant and machinery. The court also reviewed valuation reports for properties in Jamshedpur and Gujarat.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the interlocutory application with liberty for BSFC to proceed against the responsible parties in accordance with the law. It also opened and reviewed valuation reports for properties in Jamshedpur and Gujarat, making decisions regarding fresh sale notices and fixing reserve prices and dates of sale.

Issues: Interlocutory application for action against responsible parties, valuation reports for properties in Jamshedpur and Gujarat.

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the withdrawal of the interlocutory application with liberty for the BSFC to take action as permissible under the law. It also made decisions regarding the fresh sale notices and fixed reserve prices and dates of sale based on the valuation reports.

Final Decision: The interlocutory application was dismissed with liberty for BSFC to proceed against the responsible parties in accordance with the law. The court also made decisions regarding the fresh sale notices and fixed reserve prices and dates of sale for the properties in Jamshedpur and Gujarat.

ORDER

R.K. Merathia, J.

1. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Counsel appearing for the BSFC submitted that this I.A., has been filed for taking action against the Ex-Director/any other persons, who are responsible for removing mortgaged plant and machinery.

2. The Official Liquidator submitted that he is not in a position to inform this Court about the allegations made in this interlocutory application. However, he submitted that the BSFC can taken action as may be permissible under the law.

3. On this, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan sought permission to withdraw this interlocutory application with liberty to the BSFC to proceed in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the BSFC to proceed against the Ex- Director/any other persons responsible for removal of the assets in accordance with law.

5. I.A. No. 261/2011 stands disposed of.

C.P. No. 3 of 2003

6. The Valuation Report with regard to Jamshedpur property NS- 6, submitted by the Allahabad Bank and BSFC in terms of the order dated 7.1.2001 is opened in the Court. Let a copy of the valuation report be handed over to the Official Liquidator, who, in turn, will hand over a copy thereof to Mr. R.R. Nath, counsel appearing for Allahabad Bank and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, counsel appearing for BSFC.

7. It appears from the valuation report that the valuer has assessed the realizable value (forced sale value) at Rs. 95.41 lakhs. The earlier valuation was Rs. 1 crore.

8. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Counsel appearing for BSFC submitted that a fresh publication may be made after canceling the earlier sale notice as the highest bid was for Rs. 31 lakhs as will appear from the order dated 7.1.2011.

9. Mr. B.K. Jha, representative of M/s. Amit Trading Corporation and the other bidder Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha of M/s. Friends Associates, are personally present in Court.

10. The earlier sale notice and the bids of M/s. Amit Trading Corporation and M/s. Friends Associates are cancelled. The Official Liquidator will return their drafts of earnest money, if possible, in course of the day.

11. As suggested by Mr. Nath and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, a fresh sale notice will be published in Prabhat Khabar (Hindi) Jamshedpur edition, Times of India (English), Kolkata and Ranchi editions and The Telegraph (English), Kolkata and Jamshedpur editions. The Official Liquidator will supply the proforma of sale notice to Mr. Nath and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan within a week, who will get the notices published at their own expenses jointly.

12. As suggested by the secured creditors, the reserve price is fixed at Rs. 70 lakhs and EMD is fixed at 20% of the reserve price.

13. The date of sale is fixed on 25.3.2011.

14. With regard to Gujarat property. Mr. Pathak, produced a valuation report in sealed cover, which was opened in Court. Let a copy of the valuation report be handed over to the Official Liquidator, who in turn, will hand over a copy thereof to Mr. R.R. Nath and Mr. A.K. Pathak. The valuer has assessed the fare market value at Rs. 28.10 lakhs.

15. As prayed by Mr. Pathak, put up this case on 18.2.2011 with regard to Gujarat property only.

16. Let a copy of this order be handed over to the Official Liquidator.

Application dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top