SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 746

N.N.TIWARI
Babu Ram Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

N.N. Tiwari, J.

1. By the Court.--In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 10.6.2004 passed in Misc. Case No. M.R.N. 13 of 1996.

2. It has been stated that the petitioners had purchased the land from one Bhaiya Mathili Sharan. The land originally belonged to one Sadashiv Lal. Sadashiv Lal had transferred the land in question to one Ganga Prasad way back in the year 1906. The Cadestral Survey Khewat No. 2 was recorded in the name of Ganga Prasad and others. Ganga Prasad and others settled the said lands to different persons by virtue of registered documents. The settlees were recorded as Mukrirdars in respect of C.S. Khewet Nos. 3/1 to 3/5 and Khewet No. 3/6. The Mukrirdars, through whom the Opposite Parties claimed the land, were required to pay rent to the superior landlord-Ganga Prasad and others. As the Mukrirdars defaulted in paying rent to the superior landlord, two Rent Suit were filed in the year 1916-17. Both the suits were decreed. Thereafter, Execution Case Nos. 216 and 161 of 1919 was levied by the superior landlords to execute the rent decrees. In the said Execution Case, the entire interest of Mukarari Khewet was taken back by








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top