SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 967

JAYA ROY
Binod Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha
For the State : A.P.P.
For the Bank : Mr. M.B. Lal, Mr. R.R. Nath

JUDGMENT

Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State and the counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.2.

2. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B of the I.P.C., pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that the complainant (Chief Manager, Allahabad Bank, Park Market, Hirapur, Branch, Dhanbad) -the opposite party No.2 has filed a complaint case in the court of C.J.M., Dhanbad, alleging therein that the informant is presently the Chief Manager of Allahabad Bank, Park Market, Hirapur, Branch, Dhanbad and accused No.2 Shiv Dutta Mishra on 19th February 2004 took house loan of Rs.8,70,000/-from the said Branch in connivance with the petitioner. It is alleged that the said accused No.2 and the general power of attorney holder of the M/s Shankaran Construction Company (the petitioner) and he is also having registered power of attorney from the land holder Smt. Pushpa Singh executed an agreement to purchase one Flat i.e. Flat No.1 on the ground Floor in the said Apartment on the strength of the said agreement accused No.2 Shibdutt Mishra took house lo









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top