SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 727

R.K.MEAATHIA, D.N.UPADHYAY
Basudeo Mandal @ Kalua @ Kalu Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P. Deo, amicus curiae and Ashish Kumar, amicus curiae, for the appellant.
APP, for the State.

JUDGMENT

By Court. - Heard Mr. K.P. Deo, learned amicus curiae assisted by Mr. Ashish Kumar on behalf of the Appellant. They were appointed amicus Curiae on 02.05.2012 to assist the Court as nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant. Heard counsel for the State also.

2. This criminal appeal has been directed against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15th April, 1991 and 22nd April, 1991 respectively passed by the Sessions Judge, Santhal Parganas at Dumka in Sessions Case No. 195 of 1987 convicting the appellant to undergo R.I. for life for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that Shakinath Mandal (PW 4) lodged fard beyan before the Police on 16.08.1986 at about 6:00 p.m. in presence of others that at about 3:30-4:00 p.m., there was quarrel between the children of the parties whereupon, the appellant and others came there using filthy language. Appellant was having his licensed double barrel gun. The brother of the informant Hiranath Mandal (deceased) warned the accused persons not to use filthy language. On this, the appellant caused fire-arm injury on his chest which hit him under his neck due to which he





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top