Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the Judgment dated 25.2.2003 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar, in Cr. Appeal No. 11 of 1999 / 108 of 2002, whereby the appeal filed against the Judgment dated 12.2.1999 passed by Shri A. K. Yadav, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhupur at Deoghar, in G.R. No. 516 of 1995 / T.R. No. 238 of 1999, was dismissed by the Appellate Court below with modification in sentence. It may be stated that the trial Court had found the petitioners guilty for the offence under Sections 341/323/324/326/504/34 of the I.P.C., and had convicted them for the same. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the Trial Court had denied the privilege of the Probation of Offenders Act to the petitioners and had sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for one year each for the offence under Sections 341/323/504/34 of the I.P.C., and further simple imprisonment for two years each for the offence under Section 324/326/34 of the I.P.C. Upon appeal, the learned Appellate Court below set-aside the conviction of the petitioner Jugal Kishore Gupta for the offence