APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Sheo Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has prayed for issuance of mandamus commending upon the respondents to refund the petitioner a sum of Rs. 7,52,061.90 being the amount of the difference of excise duty resulting from reduction in the rates of duty imposed on India made foreign liquor and beer w.e.f. 1.7.2004.
3. According to the petitioner he is the proprietor of Libra Marketing and holds excise license in Form 1 at Jharia in the district of Dhanbad for the sale of India made foreign liquor and beer to other licensed dealers. Petitioner purchases its excisable articles from different distributors holding license in Form 19C in the State and sells it to the retail vendors under the terms and conditions of the license. It is submitted that under the Bihar Excise Act, 1950 the manufacture , import , export , transport, sale and possession of intoxicating liquor is regulated and section 10 of the Act imposes restriction on export or transport of intoxicants unless duty is paid under Chapter V or a bond has been executed, thereof. Under Section 28 of the Act, the State provides for ways of levying duty on excisable articles. Learned counsel for the petitioner fur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.