SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1592

P.P.BHATT
Nago Rajak – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Samir Kumar Lall Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. D.K Karmakar. Advocate.

ORDER

The petitioner by way of filing this present petition under 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing the order dated 26.4.2012 as contained in Annexure-of the writ petition passed by the learned Civil Judge(Jr. Division)-I Jamshedpur in Eviction suit No. 51 of 2008 whereby the learned court below has allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff/respondent under section 15 of B.B.C Act and directed the petitioner-defendant to deposit the rent for nine months from December, 2007 to August 2008 at the rate of Rs. 300/-per month amounting to Rs. 2700/-as well as for payment of current rent from, the month of September, 2008 to March 2012( i.e. till the month prior to this order) i.e. for 55 months at t6he rate of Rs. 300/-per month amounting to Rs.16,500/- i.e. total amount of Rs. 19,200/- to be deposed in the court below within 15 days of this order.

2. The learned court below further directed to the petitioner-defendant to deposit future rent for the month of April, 2012 on wards in court by 15th of each next following month onwards regularly, till disposal of this suit.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the court below has committ







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top