1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is challenging the order passed by respondent no. 3 dated 29th August, 2009, which is at Annexure-2 to the memo of the petition, whereby, benefit of first Assured Career Progression scheme, which was given in the year 1999, has been withdrawn as well as benefit of second Assured Career Progression scheme, which was given on 9th April, 2003, has also been withdrawn and that too without giving any notice and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Thus, there is violation of principles of natural justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that it has been stated in paragraphs 7 and 14 of the memo of the petition that without giving any notice and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, impugned order has been passed. These allegations have not been denied, though the counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that reasons, which are given in the impugned order are not tenable at law. Had an opportunity been given to the petitioner, he would have pointed out that the reasons