PRAKASH TATIA, JAYA ROY
Ramdhani Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Feckon Constructions & Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present appellants are aggrieved against the order dated 21.10.2011 passed in W.P.(C) No. 639 of 2010 by which, after rejecting the Interlocutory Application being I.A. No. 3087 of 2011 filed by 17 persons-appellants, the learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition with direction that the petitioner shall once again move an application before Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi to ensure that the life, liberty and property in the writ petition be safeguarded from the antisocial elements and needful shall be done on deposit (by petitioner) of necessary expenses and cost within a period of six weeks.
3. The facts of the present case as stated by the writ petitioner in his writ petition are that present controversy is relating to the immovable property comprises of land, building and orchard appertaining to M.S.Plot No. 1608 and 1609 corresponding to Municipal Holding No. 488 (Old), 1185 (New) in Ward No. VII (Old), 17 (New) of Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi measuring an area of 5.528 acres or about, situated at Mauza Konka at 62, Circular Road, Ranchi in the town of Ranchi. The recor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.