SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1762

H.C.MISHRA
Harihar Sao – Appellant
Versus
Shyamdeo Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Atanu Banerjee
For the Opposite party : Mrs. G. Devi

JUDGMENT:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite party.

2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 10.6.2008 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in Case No.2 of 2006, whereby the order passed under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C., directing the 2nd party-petitioners for opening the drainage of the water of the house of the 1st party, passing through the land of the 2nd party, has been made absolute by the Court below.

3. From perusal of the impugned order, it is apparent that this is a case of dispute between two private parties. The proceeding was initiated on the application filed by the 1st party-opposite party alleging that the passage of the water from his house was illegally blocked by the members of the 2nd party-petitioners. The 1st Party claimed to be the owner the plot No.547 in Khata No.4, measuring 52 decimals, situated in village Baridari, P.S. Mahuatand, District Bokaro, on which, the 1st party has constructed his house and the sewerage water of the said house had a passage towards an open land, which was allegedly closed by the members of the 2nd party, causing obstruction to the flow of the sewer





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top