SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Nageshwar Prasad Shaw – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
1. Challenging the penalty order dated 20.12.2003 and the revisional order dated 09.11.2004, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Head Constable in the year 1986 and he was posted as Head Constable Driver, B.T.P.S, Bokaro Thermal since 2001. By letter dated 14.12.2002, the petitioner was directed to furnish details of the TVS (Victor) motorcycle bearing No. JH09 B/1588 which was found to be in his possession for the last two months. The petitioner furnished the details of purchase of the said motorcycle on 16.12.2002 and by letter dated 20.12.2002, the petitioner further furnished the details of payment of money. The father-in law of the petitioner also intimated the authority that the said motorcycle was purchased by him for his younger daughter who was soon to be married. On 07.02.2003, the petitioner was issued a showcause notice requiring him to explain within three days why he failed to furnish property details in terms of Rule 18(3) of C.C.S. (Conduct) Rules. The petitioner submitted his explanation however, on 24.04.2003 a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner in which the petitioner submitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.