PRAKASH TATIA, JAYA ROY
Shantanu Kumar Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
L.P.A. Nos.495 of 2012, 515 of 2012 and 438 of 2012 have been listed in the category of “Hearing” on 29.4.2013 in spite of the fact that in L.P.A. Nos. 438 of 2012 and 515 of 2012, delay has not been condoned and these appeals have not been admitted.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant in L.P.A. No. 495 of 2012 submitted that all these matters have been listed since he sought permission for listing these matters by way of Bench slip, which was granted by this Court and, therefore, office may have inadvertently tagged all these matters and placed them under the category of “Hearing”.
3. Office is directed to take care in future that whenever any permission is obtained by the learned counsel in any matter for listing the same in the Court, then the matter should be listed as per permission granted in the Bench slip and if, there is no specific order for listing the case for a particular purpose, the office shall list the matter under appropriate category under which it is already fixed for like, if it is 'for admission', it should be listed 'for admission' and if it is 'for orders', it should be listed 'for orders' and if it is 'for hearing', then it is to be listed under the c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.