SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1258

APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Central Coalfields Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ananda Sen and Amit Kumar Verma, for the petitioner.
S. Akhtar, for the respondents.

ORDER

By the Court.-Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Writ petition was preferred for quashing the order dated 22nd March. 2007. issued by the Certificate Officer, Dhanbad Mining Circle. Dhanbad under Section 9 of the Jharkhand and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914, raising a demand of Rs. 90, 73, 052.00 failing which his account should be attached.

3. The controversy raised in the writ petition can be cut short in view of the categorical statements made in the counter affidavit that against a demand of Rs. 9, 61, 03, 273.00 comprising the certificate amount as well as the interest the petitioner-company has paid an amount of Rs. 8,70,30,221.00 vide demand draft dated 21st February, 2007. It is further stated that against the balance dues of certificate of Rs. 90,73,052.00 the petitioner was given a chart which they have verified and according to the petitioner an amount of Rs. 89.54.807.85.00 is correct as per the photocopy of the calculation chart submitted by the petitioner-company vide Reference No. PO/GVP/Royalty/3128, dated 30th July, 2007 (Annexure-C) to the counter-affidavit. However, in view of the pendency of the writ application the said amount has not













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top