Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner's name is the same which was there in the F.I.R. and in the charge-sheet, whereas, in the impugned order, the name has wrongly been recorded.

2. In view of the submission, defect No.9(iii) is hereby, ignored.

3. So far as defect No.9 (ii) is concerned, the same be removed in course of the day.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.

5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the record, it does appear that the petitioners were made accused in a case registered as Adityapur P.S. Case No.111 of 2004 [G.R. No.374 of 2004] under sections 379, 411 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter the matter was taken up for investigation and it took almost six years in submitting charge-sheet which was submitted on 31.01.2010. While the matter was under investigation, all the five petitioners were granted bail on 2.07.2004. On submission of the charge-sheet, cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 379, 411/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code was taken against the petitioners on 4.03.2010, on which