SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Jhk) 289

N.N.TIWARI
Nirbhay Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the petitioner:Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
For the State: J.C. to A.G.

ORDER

1. In I.A. No.82 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for direction on the respondents to issue order of appointment on the basis of the report of measurement submitted by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Bokaro.

2. In the writ petition, the petitioner has claimed that he was duly selected for the post of Constable. But due to erroneous recording of his height as 181 cm., he was awarded only 13 marks. The petitioner's height is 182 cm. and he is entitled to get 14 marks. The petitioner has been over all awarded 20 marks. The last candidate, who was appointed, obtained 21 marks. It has been submitted that the lesser height was recorded to deprive the petitioner of the said score of 21 marks. The petitioner protested, but that was not corrected. The petitioner, thereafter, filed this writ petition.

3. By order dated 5th July, 2012 this Court directed the Civil Surgeon, Bokaro to measure the height of the petitioner and submit a report to this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Surgeon has measured the petitioner's height as 182 cm. and submitted a report to this Court. The petitioner, is accordingly, entitled to get 14 marks for that height and over all 21 marks and is enti






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top