SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1092

N.N.TIWARI
Shankar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.K. Mahto, Advocate
For the State : J.C. to G.P.VI

ORDER

In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 28.6.2011 issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bundu, Ranchi, communicated by the Block Supply Officer, Sonahatu, District Ranchi, whereby the petitioner's P.D.S. Licence has been put under suspension on the ground of pendency of the enquiry.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that even after lapse of more than a year, the suspension has not been revoked by the respondents. He submitted that Clause-11 of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984 clearly provides that the licence can be put under suspension only for an interim period of 90 days and not beyond that. But in the instant case, the said provision of law has been ignored by the concerned authority and no order of revocation has been passed till date.

3. The respondents have contested this writ petition by filing a counter affidavit. It has been stated, inter-alia, that several complaints were received against the petitioner which were enquired into. On the basis of the enquiry report the impugned order of suspension was issued.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top