SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Jhk) 98

H.C.MISHRA
Joginder Chand Kapur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Rahul Gupta. for the petitioners.
A.P.P. for the State.

ORDER

I.A. No. 1684 oJ2012

By the Court.-This interlocutory application has been filed for deleting the name of petitioner No.1. Joginder Chand Kapur. who died on 24.10.12 in, a Hospital in the State of Karnataka and to this effect the death certificate of petitioner No. 1 has also been brought on record.

Accordingly. the name of petitioner No.1, Joginder Chand Kapur is deleted from the cause title of this case.

This interlocutory application is accordingly, allowed.

Cr. Revision No. 641 of 2007

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.

2. No one appears on behalf of the complainant-Opp. Party No. 2 in spite of repeated calls. It appears that on• earlier occasion also no one had appeared on behalf of the complainant and the case was adjourned in order to give a chance to the counsel of the complainant Opp. Party No.2. In spite of repeated calls today also, no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant Opp. Party No.2.

3. The petitioner, Sunil Kapur is aggrieved by the order dated 5.6.07 passed by Sri A.K. Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class. Koderma, in complaint case No. 382 of 2004, whereby the petition filed by the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top