R.R.PRASAD
Rajendra Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
By the Court.-Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 as well as learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. This application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 12.03.2012, whereby, warrant of arrest has been ordered to be issued against the petitioner and also for quashing of the order dated 23.05.2012, and 26.06.2012. whereby, processes were ordered to be issued under Section 82 of the Cr PC as well as under Section 83 of the Cr PC respectively.
3. Mr. Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a case was registered as Dhanbad [Bank Morel P.S. Case No. 104 of 2012 larising out of Complaint Case No. 154 of 2012] for commission of the offence punishable under Sections 406. 420. 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. In that case warrant of arrest was ordered to be issued on 12.03.2012. When the warrant of arrest was issued the petitioner moved to this Court for quashing of the First Information Report in a Writ Petition being W.P.[Crl.] No. 49 of 2012. The Court after hearing it at the first instance, passed an order to the effect that no coercive action shall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.