SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Jhk) 978

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Aparesh Kr. Singh, J.
Jaiprakash Singh - Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondents
WP(S) No. 2986 of 2010
Decided on : 20.8.2013

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Sujit Narayan Prasad, Saurabh Shekhar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sumir Prasad.

Headnote:Service Law-Salary---Petitioner was denied the arrears of salary of additional charge relying upon Rule 58 of Jharkhand Service Code-grounds mentioned u/r 58 have not been made out in this case-impugned order is cryptic and also suffers from non-application of mind and same set aside---respondents directed to release arrears of difference of salary to petitioner.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By the impugned order contained in letter no. 879 dated 20.5.2010 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, respondent no. 4, the claim of the petitioner for release of arrears of difference of salary with retrospective effect consequent upon regular promotion on the post of Deputy Director w.e.f. 1.7.2001 has been rejected. Petitioner also seeks direction upon the respondents to forthwith release entire arrears of difference of salary w.e.f. 2.7.2007 to 15.12.2009 on account of the regular promotion to the post of Additional Director on which post, according to him, he was regularly discharging his duties from 2.7.2007 itself.

3. According to the petitioner, he was given additional charge to the post of Deputy Director under the Mines and Geology Department vide notification no. 4198 dated 1.11.1999 vide Annexure-1. He is said to have assumed charge on 4.11.1999 vide Annexure-2. Vide Annexure-3 notification no. 723 dated 28.5.2009, he was promoted to the post of Deputy Director with retrospective effect from 1.7.2001. The instant notification also refers that he was working as In-charge Director, Geology, Government of Jharkhand at the relevant point of time i.e. issuance of the notification no. 900 dated 28.5.2009. Vide Annexure-4, he assumed full-fledged charge of Deputy Director on 28.5.2009, which is counter signed by Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Jharkhand. Vide Annexure-5 dated 29.6.2007, he was given additional charge of Additional Director vide notification no. 1468 dated 29.6.2007. The said notification also recorded that he was working as In-charge Deputy Director in the respondents Department at the time of issuance of notification of 29.6.2007. Vide Annexure-5/1, he assumed charge as In-charge Additional Director, Geology, Government of Jharkhand, on 2.7.2007 pursuant to the notification dated 29.6.2007. Again vide notification no. 1903 dated 16.12.2009, Annexure-6, he was given regular promotion to the post of Additional Director, Department of Geology, Government of Jharkhand w.e.f. 2.7.2007. The said notification also refers that the petitioner being in capacity of Deputy Director was also working as In-charge Director, in the Geology Department. In the said circumstances, the petitioner's claim for financial benefit to the promoted post on which he was promoted with retrospective effect on 1.7.2001 and 2.7.2007 is being refused vide impugned order dated 20.5.2010, Annexure-7.

4. The respondent in their counter affidavit have stated that such claims have been rejected upon the instruction of the Finance Department. The impugned order is a cryptic order which simply says that the financial benefit arising out of the retrospective promotion is being refused on the basis of the resolution dated 4.4.1995. The reliance basically is based upon Rule 58 of the Jharkhand Service Code which reads as under:–

"58(a). Subject to any exceptions specifically made in these rules and to the provisions of clause (b) of this rule, a Government servant shall begin to draw the pay and allowances attached to his tenure of a post with effect from the date on which he assumes the duties of that post, and shall cease to draw them as soon as he ceases to discharge those duties.

(b) Unless in any individual case the State Government otherwise direct a person recruited overseas shall commence to draw pay on first appointment as follows:-

(i) in the case of a person who receives a first class passage to India, from the date of his arrival in India, [subject to his proceeding to take up his duties without avoidable delay].

(ii) in the case of a person who receives a second class passage to India from the date of his embarkation for India."

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Kedar Nath vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. in W.P.(S) No. 1100 of 2007 vide judgment dated 22.6




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top