SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Manish Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Rural Development, Ranchi – Respondent
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of order dated 04.02.2013 whereby his service has been terminated.
2. The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner was appointed on 17.04.2010 pursuant to an advertisement issued on 10.04.2010. The petitioner joined the post of District Accounts Manager on 19.04.2010. It appears that on 29.01.2013 a letter was written by State Rural Employment Guarantee Commissioner, State of Jharkhand to the Deputy Commissioner directing him to comply with the guidelines with respect to appointment of District Accounts Manager. Pursuant to the direction dated 29.01.2013, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Latehar terminated the service of the petitioner on the ground that the post on which the petitioner was appointed was not sanctioned by the Government.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 04.02.2013 has been passed without issuing any showcause notice to the petitioner and on this ground alone, the impugned order dated 04.02.2013 is liable to be quashed. He has further submitted that the plea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.