R.BANUMATHI, D.N.PATEL
Baidyanath Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
In this Public Interest Litigation, the Petitioner seeks a direction to stay the construction work of drains at Katharkocha to Birsa Chowk in the heart point of Ranchi and if the construction of drains is not stopped, the entire communication of general public of Katharkocha, Birsa Chowk will be badly affected due to blockage of road, since there is no alternative way to go out from the house of the tribal people.
2. According to the case of the Petitioner, RRDA already sanctioned road construction from Birsa Chowk to Katharkocha but due to non-availability of N.O.C. from Railway authority, it was not completed. People of locality have represented before the Secretary, Railway Department, Government of India, but no action has been taken to construct the road. But suddenly, the authority started earth-cutting work for drain from Birsa Chowk to Katharkocha blocking the entire access of people of the area. Earlier petitioner had filed one W.P.(PIL) No. 4958 of 2004 and W.P.(PIL) No. 739 of 2005 and Cont. (Civil) Case No. 39 of 2007. Petitioner contends that if the road is not constructed, several people will be affected and, therefore, the writ petitioner seeks for direction to s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.