SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Jhk) 1374

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.
Suman Kumar Srivastava - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 3748 of 2010
Decided on: 20.12.2013

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.K. Dubey, J.C. to A.G.

Headnote:Service Law---Discharge---Appointment on post of Police Constable obtained by playing fraud---Fresh proceeding is permissible on the same charges---Petitioner was rightly discharged from service---Appointment obtained by fraud cannot be allowed to stand.

ORDER

Questioning the issuance of charge-sheet dated 16.07.2010, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition. During the pendency of the writ petition, order of discharge dated 01.11.2013 was issued which was challenged by the petitioner by filing amendment application and the said application being I.A. No. 8448 of 2013 has been allowed.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents on record.

3. Pursuant to Advertisement No. 01 of 2004, the petitioner applied for the post of Constable in Jharkhand Armed Police Force and he was selected and appointed on the post of Constable. The petitioner joined the post on 18.05.2005. On 11.01.2007, the petitioner was summoned by the Inspector General of Police, J.A.C., Ranchi and his height was re-measured on 11.01.2007. By order dated 25.01.2007, the petitioner was discharged from service with immediate effect. The petitioner challenged the order of discharge dated 25.01.2007 in W.P.(S) No. 2717 of 2007 which was allowed by order dated 20.11.2009 and the impugned order dated 25.01.2007 was quashed. The respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner in service with 50 % back-wages. Accordingly, the petitioner was reinstated in service. On 26.02.2010, a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner and a charge-memo dated 16.07.2010 was served upon the petitioner on the allegation that he secured appointment deceitfully getting his height measured at 171.5 cm. The petitioner responded to the show-cause notice and the charge-sheet issued to him, raising a plea of res-judicata and pendency of Contempt Case (Civil) No. 138 of 2010. Finally, by order dated 01.11.2013, the petitioner has been discharged from service with immediate effect.

4. A counter-affidavit has been filed stating that when the height of the petitioner was re-measured, it was found that initially the height of the petitioner was wrongly measured at 171.5 cm and on that basis he was offered appointment. On re-measurement, his height has been found 165.2 cm. Paragraph nos. 8 to 12 of the counter-affidavit are reproduced below :

8. “That it is humbly stated that the petitioner had earlier preferred the writ petition WP(S) No. 2717/2007 for quashing the force order no. 74/07 dated 25.01.2007 passed by then Commandant, J.A.P.-9, Sahibganj whereby the petitioner was discharged from the post of constable from Jharkhand Armed Police-'IX' Batalion, Sahibganj, Camp-Deoghar on the ground that the height of the petitioner was re-measured in view of the anonymous/secret complaint letter, which is given to the office of Inspector General of Police, Vigilance cum Jharkhand Armed Police, Ranchi. Thereafter, a proper enquiry and re-measurement of the height of the petitioner has been done by the then Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, Ranchi on dated 11.01.2007 in presence of then Commandant, J.A.P.-1, Ranchi in his office, wherein after re-measurement the actual height of the petitioner was found 165.2 cm, which is much lesser than the height 171.5 cm, which was contrary and wrongly recorded at the time of selection by the selection committee & also the height differ from the height mentioned by the petitioner himself in his application form i.e. 176 cm. Thereafter for this reason the then Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, Ranchi issued a letter vide memo no. 27/C dated 16.01.2007 to the then Commandant, J.A.P.-7, Hazaribagh-cum-Chairman of selection committee, Board No. 3 stating therein about the difference in the height of the petitioner. Thereafter the Chairman of Selection Committee, Board no. 3 had issued a letter to the Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, Ranchi vide memo. no. 142 / G.S. Dated 21.01.2007 stating therein that due to the difference in the height of the petitioner, which is on re-measurement found to be 165.2 cm. The petitioner's point was reduced from 16 to 13, for which the Chairman of selection committee, Board























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top