R.R.PRASAD
Shiv Narayan Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Vigilance – Respondent
By the Court - Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance.
2. This revision application is directed against the order dated 20/02/2013, passed in Special Case No. 85 of 2010 (Vigilance P.S. Case No. 68 of 2010), registered under Sections 403, 109, 120B, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Sections 7/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, whereby and whereunder the prayer for discharge of the petitioner was rejected.
3. It appears that in compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P (PIL) No.1530 of 2009, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Vigilance Department wherein it was found that in spite of Junior Engineers of Building Division being available, Assistant Teachers, who were having diploma/degree were deputed to supervise and to construct building of primary schools and other schools situated in different blocks of Bokaro district under the sponsored programme of the Government. They, in course of constructing/supervising of construction work of the building of the schools, indulged themselves in corrupt practices and thereby, they put
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.