R.BANUMATHI, SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar-II – Respondent
Aggrieved by order dated 23.01.2013 in and by which the Central Administrative Tribunal allowed O.A. No. 108 of 2011 (R) with a direction to the Department to reconsider reevaluation of the Answer Sheets of the applicant and to complete the exercise within four months from the date of communication of order, the present writ petition has been filed.
Brief Facts
2. The applicant was appointed as Sorting Assistant and he had been working in the Office of the Superintendent, R.M.S., Ranchi since 01.07.1997. He appeared in the departmental examination for the I.P.Os. Examination, 2007 held between 10.08.2007 to 12.08.2007, for which the result was declared on 26.02.2008. Though, the respondent herein obtained total of 300 marks in five papers, he could secure only 39 marks in Paper-II and 18 Marks in Paper-III and therefore, he was declared unsuccessful. The respondent-applicant made a representation on 09.11.2011 for reevaluation of Paper-II and Paper-III of I.P.Os. Examination, 2007. An application under the R.T.I. Act, 2005 was also made by the respondent on 27.10.2009 and the reply on 5 points query made by the respondent as well as Answer Sheets of Paper-II and Paper-III of I
Pramod Kumar Srivastava Vs. Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.