SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Jhk) 89

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Nagina Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Dr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate
For the Respondents: J.C. to A.G.

ORDER :

Petitioner approached this Court inter alia for the following reliefs:

(a) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 13.04.2007 passed by appellate authority and the order dated 31.03.2004 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, respectively whereby and where under respondents have dismissed the petitioner from services and also quash the order dated 04.05.2009 passed in appeal memorial by Director General of Police cum Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi.

(b) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to reinstate the petitioner from the date of dismissal with all consequential benefits.

2. The brief facts argued by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that-Petitioner was appointed as Constable in the State of Bihar in the year, 1977 and was promoted to the post of Hawaldar in the year, 1987.While the petitioner was posted in Chaibasa, a charge sheet was served upon him alleging inter alia therein that petitioner started going in the residence of Miss. Elzina Badh, the resident of Hazaribagh Sadar by disclosing his identity as a father of Church.He used to send letters by writing in th
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top