RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Gurudev Mahato – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Chakulia (Shyam Sunderpur) P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014, which has been registered for the offences under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code as also Rule 4/54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004.
3. The prosecution story as would appear from the FIR instituted by the Circle Officer, Chakulia is that in course of inspection, three vehicles bearing registration no. UR 28B-2659, JH05-AA-7749 and U.K. 8268 were found loaded with sand. On being queried, the driver could not produce any valid document to substantiate the transportation of sand.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the provisions of Sections 4 and 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the First Information Report could not be registered under Section 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code as the special law on the subject i.e. the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act as well as the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules will override the provisions of the general
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.