PRAMATH PATNAIK
Dewanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Pramath Patnaik, J.
1. In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing of order as contained in Memo no.679 dated 12.12.2006 (Annexure-5) issued under the signature of respondent no.5 by which the petitioner has been informed that in pursuance of letter no.905 dated 04.12.2006 of respondent no.4, the petitioner has been dismissed from services by respondent no.3.
2. The factual matrix sans details, in a nutshell is that the petitioner was selected on the post of Sahaika (Assistant) by a duly constituted Selection Committee meeting held on 09.06.2004 in pursuance to the order passed by respondent no.5. Consequent upon the said selection, the petitioner has been posted as Sahaika at Aanganbari Centre Basidih-I vide order dated 11.09.2004 (Annexure-1 to the writ application). After coming to know the irregularities committed by one Sewika Latika Kumari, the petitioner filed an application on 10.11.2006 to the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh (respondent no.2) and requested for doing the needful in the matter as depicted in Annexure-2 to the writ application. The aforesaid fact was also flashed in local daily ‘Hazaribagh Jagaran’ dated 11.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.