SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
Madhukar Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Aggrieved by tender notice published in daily newspaper “Prabhat Khabar” on 22.07.2015, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. The petitioner entered into an agreement for supply of food-grains under “Door Step Delivery” scheme on 01.08.2014 which was valid upto 31.03.2015. For the subsequent year another agreement was executed on 11.03.2015 which was valid upto 31.03.2016. During the currency of the agreement executed between the parties, the respondent-Deputy Commissioner has issued advertisement on 22.07.2015 inviting applications for supply of food-grains under “Door Step Delivery” scheme. Aggrieved the petitioner has approached this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has previously executed work under agreement dated 01.08.2014 without complain. For the subsequent year, another agreement has been executed on 11.03.2015 and there has been no complain against the petitioner. The said agreement is subsisting till 31.03.2016 however, for the remaining period, the impugned advertisement has been issued which has caused serious prejudice to the petitioner. It is submitted that for executing work under agreement dated 11.03.2015,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.