AMITAV K.GUPTA
Md. Kalim – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. This Criminal Revision Application has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 07.06.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Palamau in Cr. Appeal No.96 of 2007, affirming the judgment and order of conviction dated 07.08.2007, passed by the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltongang G.R. No.701 of 2000 corresponding to T.R. No.187 of 2007 whereby, the petitioners were sentenced to undergo R.I for two years and a fine of Rs.500/-each for the offence under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C, to undergo R.I for six months under Section 323 of the I.P.C, to undergo R.I for six months and fine of Rs.300/-each for the offence under Section 4 of the D.P. Act and in default to undergo additional S.I for four months.
2. Brief facts of the prosecution's case is that the marriage between the informant/ Jarina Bibi and Jasmuddin Ansari was solemnized in the year 1991 as per Muslim rites and custom; that her husband's behaviour was cordial towards her. At the time of marriage, her father had given gifts and in spite of that the petitioner Nos.01 to 04, who happen to be the father-in-law, Bhaisur, Gotni and Nand respectively, u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.