D.N. Patel, J.:

I.A. No.4642 of 2015

1. This present interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condoning the delay of 02 days in preferring this Letters Patent Appeal.

2. Having heard counsels for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, there are reasonable reasons for condoning the delay in preferring this Appeal. We therefore, condone the delay in preferring the Letters Patent Appeal No. 378 of 2015.

3. I.A. No. 4642 of 2015 is allowed and disposed of.

L.P.A. No. 378 of 2015

4. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner) against the judgment and order delivered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 6828 of 2013 vide order dated 19th May, 2015, whereby, the petition preferred by this appellant has been dismissed and, therefore, this appellant (original petitioner) has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.

5. Counsel for the appellant submitted that no notice has been given, no chargesheet has been given, no procedure has been followed and hence, the order of termination of services of this appellant dated 31st August, 2013 deserve