The wife and two minor sons of opposite party no.2Manish Ranjan have preferred this revision against the order dated 22nd February, 2014 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in Miscellaneous Case No.03 of 2011 with the prayer to enhance the maintenance amount of Rs.7000/per month granted by the court below in favour of the petitioner no.1the wife. However, the amount of maintenance of Rs.3500/per month each awarded to the two minor sons, have not been challenged by the petitioner no.1 (the wife).

2. The petitioner no.1 alongwith her two minor sons presented a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘the Code’) on 16.03.2011 in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella with the pleadings that her marriage with Manish Ranjan, the present opposite party no.2 was solemnized on 21.02.2003 in the District of Gaya as per Hindu rites and custom. At the time of marriage, huge cash amount, car, jewellery and house hold articles were given to the parents of her husband and after marriage she came to her matrimonial home and lived their peacefully for almost four months but thereafter her inlaws particularly fatherinlaw and mo