Pramath Patnaik, J.:

In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner, interalia, has prayed for quashing the order dated 18.03.2009 issued by respondent no. 2 wherein it has been ordered that except subsistence allowance, no payment of any amount will be admissible to the petitioner for the period of suspension i.e. from 04.02.1996 to 16.08.99 and further punishment equivalent to dismissal has been inflicted upon the petitioner and thereby it has been ordered that payment of pension, gratuity, amount of unutilized earned leave shall not be payable to the petitioner and for commanding the respondents not to give effect to the order dated 18.03.2009 and for payment for entire retiral benefit to the petitioner, by quashing the entire departmental proceeding as initiated against the petitioner.

2. Sans details, facts as disclosed in the writ application in a nutshell is that the petitioner while continuing as an accountant had withdrawn excess amount from the treasury, Lohardagga in the district of Lohardagga. Thereafter, a chargesheet was submitted by the C.B.I. wherein the name of the petitioner stood at serial 1 and Annexure-D to the charge-sheet wherein the name of the wit