SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Jhk) 1359

PRASHANT KUMAR
Awadhesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.S.A.S. Pati , Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Jalisur Rahman, J.C. to G.P.-III.

ORDER :

This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 17.08.2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in G.R. No. 765 of 2012 (Adityapur (R.I.T.) P.S. Case No. 217 of 2012), whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and issued summons to the accused persons named in the charge sheet.

2. It is submitted by Sri P.S.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the petitioners that in the instant case, the police submitted charge sheet against the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 506/34 of the I.P.C., but the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 506/34 of the I.P.C., which is illegal, therefore cannot be sustained.

3. Sri Pati relied upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Gujrat Vs. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde reported in (2014) 3 SCC 659 in support of his contention.

4. On the other hand, J.C. to G.P.-III submits that in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dharam Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another reported in (2014) 3 SCC 306






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top