PRASHANT KUMAR
Awadhesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 17.08.2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in G.R. No. 765 of 2012 (Adityapur (R.I.T.) P.S. Case No. 217 of 2012), whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and issued summons to the accused persons named in the charge sheet.
2. It is submitted by Sri P.S.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the petitioners that in the instant case, the police submitted charge sheet against the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 506/34 of the I.P.C., but the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 506/34 of the I.P.C., which is illegal, therefore cannot be sustained.
3. Sri Pati relied upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Gujrat Vs. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde reported in (2014) 3 SCC 659 in support of his contention.
4. On the other hand, J.C. to G.P.-III submits that in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dharam Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another reported in (2014) 3 SCC 306
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.