SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 114

PRASHANT KUMAR
Dilip Kumar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Sahani
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, APP

Order :

This revision application is directed against the appellate order dated 24.06.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd, Bermo at Tenughat ( Bokaro) in Cr. Appeal No. 23 of 2012 affirming the judgment /order dated 20.01.2012 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat in G.R. No. 522 of 2003, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been convicted under section 279, 337 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of three months each under section 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas the learned court below sentenced the petitioner to under go simple imprisonment for six months under section 304A of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he confined this revision only on the point of sentence.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been convicted under section 279, 337 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months each under section 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas the learned court below sentenced the petitioner to under go simple imprisonment for six months under section 304A of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top