RAVI NATH VERMA
Nizam Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘the Code’) the petitioner has questioned the legality of the order dated 31.01.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat in Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No. 28 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner, for his discharge under Section 239 of the Code, has been rejected.
2. The facts of the case, which is relevant for the proper adjudication of the issue involved in this revision application, in short, is that on the basis of the self-statement of S.I. of Bokaro Thermal Police Station, the aforesaid case was lodged under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that an Scorpio vehicle bearing no. HR-30J-7168 of Hamid Khan was seized by the police. The said owner was doing the business of sale and purchase of the old vehicles and during investigation, one Salim Ansari and his driver disclosed that the said vehicle is a theft one and there is no valid paper. Thereafter on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused, Hamid Ansari and Salim Ansari, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.