SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 15

RAVI NATH VERMA
Nizam Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Priyadarshi, A.P.P.

ORDER :

1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘the Code’) the petitioner has questioned the legality of the order dated 31.01.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat in Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No. 28 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner, for his discharge under Section 239 of the Code, has been rejected.

2. The facts of the case, which is relevant for the proper adjudication of the issue involved in this revision application, in short, is that on the basis of the self-statement of S.I. of Bokaro Thermal Police Station, the aforesaid case was lodged under Sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that an Scorpio vehicle bearing no. HR-30J-7168 of Hamid Khan was seized by the police. The said owner was doing the business of sale and purchase of the old vehicles and during investigation, one Salim Ansari and his driver disclosed that the said vehicle is a theft one and there is no valid paper. Thereafter on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused, Hamid Ansari and Salim Ansari, t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top