SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 349

ANANT BIJAY SINGH
Bharat Mahato – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, A.P.P CAV

ORDER :

This appeal has been preferred by the appellants, namely, Bharat Mahato, Hukumlal Mahato, Gulab Chand Mahato and Rajendra Mahato, they stood convicted under Sections 307 I.P.C and were ordered to go rigorous imprisonment for five years vide judgment dated 09.11.2002 passed in S. T. Case No. 609 of 1993 by Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.3rd, Bokaro.

2. The case of the prosecution, as has been recorded in the fardbeyan of Hublal Rajwar by S.I., R.B. Mahto of Chas (M) Police station on 28.09.1988 at 10:45 Hrs. in Referal Hospital, Chas alleging that in the morning the cousin of the informant, Bhola Rajwar (P.W.4) along with his nephew had gone to field in order to harvest Sinduwar. In the meanwhile, Bharat Mahto, Hukum Lal Mahto, Gulab Chand Mahto and Rajendra Mahto came and asked why he is harvesting Sinduwar, thereafter hot exchange of words took place. It is alleged that Bharat Mahto was armed with Farsa and Rajendra Mahto was armed with Chota Rangeela. Gulab Chand Mahto assaulted Bhola Rajwar with farsa on the head, consequent thereupon he fell on the ground thereafter, Gulab Chand Mahto and Rajendra Mahto also assaulted with Chota Rangeela on


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top