SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 150

D.N.UPADHYAY, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Babaji – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Shailesh, Advocate
For the Respondent:- Asif Khan, Appellant

ORDER :

Heard the parties.

2. This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of Sentence dated 28.04.2004 and 30.04.2004 respectively, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No. 111 of 1999 corresponding to Dhanbad Sadar (Govindpur) P.S. Case No. 260/1993 [G.R. No. 3731/1993] whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of making payment of fine further imprisonment for three months.

3. The prosecution case, as it appear from fardbeyan of Draupadi Devi recorded on 08.10.1993 at 4:30 hrs. in brief is that the informant with her husband Gopal Chandra Mahato was sleeping in a room. At about 1:00 a.m. the informant noticed some noise and woke up. In the light she had seen appellant Babaji inflicting blows by means of sharp cutting weapon (busula mainly used by carpenters) to her husband Gopal Chandra Mahato. The informant tried to rescue but could not succeed. The appellant, after causing injury, sealed over and fled away. On hulla, mother-in-law and other re






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top