SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 319

PRAMATH PATNAIK
Rupesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Tandon, Ms. Kumari Rashmi
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Sinha

JUDGMENT :

Pramath Patnaik, J.

1. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 06.08.2011 passed by respondent no.4, the appellate authority confirming the order dated 28.05.2011 passed by the respondent no.5 pertaining to ‘removal from services’.

2. The brief facts, as has been disclosed in the writ application, in a nutshell is that while the petitioner was posted as constable at Dugda Range for controlling crime and giving due information to the higher authorities since 16.04.2010 and in course of his posting, illegal money was collected from the members of Truck owners association by the members of Central Industrial Security Force and its officials which was not communicated to higher authorities. The inaction on the part of the petitioner amounts to gross indiscipline, misconduct and involvement in corrupt practices. The said charge was issued on 21.12.2010 and inquiry officer was appointed. On the basis of statement of the delinquent those who have been proceeded departmentally separate and on the basis of confessional statement, the charges against the petitioner have been found to be proved. The respondent no.5 relying on the find















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top