SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 348

AMITAV K.GUPTA
Rakhi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ram Ashish Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. P.K. Sinha
For the Respondents: Mr. Basav Chatterjee

ORDER :

This appeal has been preferred against the order 20.12.2012, passed by learned 5th District Judge-cum-Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Hazaribagh, whereby the insurance company was directed to pay Rs. 4,64,901/-. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the award, the appellants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of the compensation on the ground that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate that it was not the case of contributory negligence and the principle of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellants that C.W.-1 and C.W.-2 were the eye-witnesses to the accident, which took place on 22.02.2006 and they have categorically stated that Tata 407 Mini Truck bearing registration no. BR-13D-0069, i.e., the offending vehicle, was being driven rashly and negligently and it dashed the motorcycle of the deceased and the other motorcycle which resulted in the death of riders of the both the motorcycles and the pillion rider of one of the motorcycles and the Mini Truck turned turtle consequent thereto, Khalashi/Cleaner of said truck died on spot. That the deceased was riding on the moto










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top