SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
D.N. UPADHYAY, J
Hari Bansh Lal, son of late Basudeo Lal - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(S)No. 6348 of 2010
Decided on : 22-07-2016

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s Pandey Neeraj Rai & Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocates
For the Respondents:M/s D.K.Dubey & Ruchi Rampuria, Advocates.

Headnote:Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 Section 5 – Rule 4 of Bihar Electricity Board Rules, 1960 – Section 172 of Electricity Act, 2003 – IT has been held the the old law has been repealed and the position of state has is very much changed now – The working of the JSEB has completely changed and thus the administration and the constitution of the board will also change – The petitioner is held not entitled for the reinstatement and his plea of depriving him of the post which was given to him earlier is not maintainable – The writ of mandamus cannot be invoked as the petitioner was not at the post of chairman – The new Act of 2003 has made it mandatory to bring necessary changes in the administration of the board and because of that there are many departments which have come up now and the petitioner consequently lost his post – The new post of chairman was advertiesd as per the Act of 2003 – The petition cannot be permitted in the light of the new Act.

JUDGMENT :

D.N.Upadhyay, J.

This Writ Application has been filed for quashing the Notification No.18/JUD-08-21/2008/1469 dated 04.09.2010 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Department of Energy, Govt. of Jharkhand by which the State Government reconstituted the Jharkhand Electricity Board by appointing Shri Shiv Basant (I.A.S.) as Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board in addition to his being member (Administration) with the sole object to frustrate the benefit granted to the petitioner by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 11013/2009 by which the petitioner has been permitted to join duty forthwith and continue as Chairman of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board in terms of his appointment order and also for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue as Chairman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board pursuant to his appointment on 17.09.2008 since the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has been pleased to set aside the order dated 27.04.2009 passed by the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court in W.P.(P.I.L.) No.5067/2008. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated 30.08.2010 has been pleased to make it clear that the continuance of the petitioner as Chairman shall be in accordance with the Section 5 (5) of the Act and Rule-4 of the Rules.

2. The brief fact behind filing of this writ application is that the petitioner was appointed Chairman of the J.S.E.B. till further order vide notification No.1877 dated 17.09.2008 and resumed charge. The appointment of petitioner was challenged by Sahodar Prasad Mahto in W.P.(PIL)No.5067/2008. After giving opportunity to the parties concerned, this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27th April, 2009 quashed the appointment of petitioner as Chairman of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board and instruction was given to the State Government to follow the direction given in letter dated 20th February, 2009 issued by the Ministry of Power Govt. of India by which the time has been extended allowing continuance of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board (for the short the J.S.E.B.) as the State Transmission Utility and licensee till 15.06.2009.

3. The petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid order dated 27th April, 2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(PIL) No.5067/2008, preferred Civil Appeal No.7165/2010 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.11013/2009) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Their Lordships have been pleased to allow the prayer of the petitioner after setting aside the order dated 27th April, 2009 and the petitioner was permitted to join duty forthwith and continue as Chairman of Jharkhand State Electricity Board in terms of his appointment order. It was also made clear that continuance to the post of Chairman is subject to the ultimate decision of the Govt, however, the same shall be in accordance with Section 5 (5) of the Act (The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and Rule-4 of the Rules (The Bihar Electricity Board Rules, 1960).

Pursuant to the order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 7165/2010 the petitioner submitted his joining on 30.08.2010 itself by sending 'FAX' message as his joining report to the Principal Secretary to his Excellency the Governor, Advisor (Energy) to his Excellency the Governor the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Jharkhand and all other concerned. It is contended that during the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(PIL) No.5067/2008 i.e. on 27.04.2009 and the order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 7165/2010 there was President rule in the State of Jharkhand.

4. When the Govt. did not succeed to obtain favourable order from the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, they have adopted different method indirectly to deprive the petitioner so that he may not continue to the post of Chairman J.S.E.B. Without any previous noting on 31.08.2010 a file was initiated disclosing therein that proposal for reconstitution of Board is pending. I

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top