SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 644

H.C.MISHRA
Chidanand Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Shanker Jha, Mr. Manish Kumar.

Order :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order bearing No. 2878 dated 25.10.2012, passed by the Respondent No.3, Director (Secondary Education), as contained in Annexure-13/1 to the writ application, whereby, the claim of the petitioners for payment of their salary w.e.f. April 1990, has been rejected by the Respondent No.3.

3. Petitioners had earlier filed W.P.(S) No.2314 of 2003 with respect to their claim, which was finally disposed of by order dated 2.3.2012, as contained in Annexure–1 series, wherein the case of the petitioners has been detailed. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 is Class III and the petitioner No. 2 is a class IV employee of Pandit Binodanand Jha Balika Sanskrit Prathamik Sah Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Deoghar, which is a Non-Government School, recognised by Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna, and the affairs of the said School are being managed by a Managing Committee of the school. After establishment of the School in the year 1981, the petitioners were appointed on non-teaching posts of clerk and peon respectively, through appointment letter issued on 01.03.1981 b






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top