IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Pramath Patnaik, J.
Binay Kumar Sinha, son of late S.S. Prasad - Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (S) No. 3956 of 2010
Decided On : 27-04-2016
Punishment - Disciplinary Proceeding - Police Manual Rule 824, Rule 828 - The court found procedural irregularities and violation of the principle of natural justice in the disciplinary proceeding. The court referred to Police Manual Rule 824 and Rule 828 and emphasized the importance of parity of punishment among co-delinquents. The impugned order of punishment was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent authorities for reconsideration of the quantum of punishment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an officer In-charge of Amlabad Outpost, was issued a charge-sheet for alleged misconduct. The inquiry report found the petitioner partially guilty and imposed the punishment of award of black mark. The petitioner appealed against the order, citing procedural irregularities and lack of opportunity for hearing.
Finding of the Court:
The court found procedural irregularities and violation of the principle of natural justice in the disciplinary proceeding. It emphasized the importance of parity of punishment among co-delinquents and quashed the impugned order of punishment, remitting the matter back to the respondent authorities for reconsideration of the quantum of punishment.
Issues: Procedural irregularities, lack of opportunity for hearing, parity of punishment among co-delinquents.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and parity of punishment among co-delinquents in disciplinary proceedings.
Final Decision: The impugned order of punishment was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent authorities for reconsideration of the quantum of punishment.
Pramath Patnaik, J.
In the instant writ application, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for quashing of the order dated 31.05.2009 passed by the respondent no.3 pertaining to infliction of punishment of award of black mark for the alleged misconduct and the order by the appellate authority dated 15.02.2010.
2. Sans details, the facts as disclosed in the writ application, that while the petitioner was continuing as officer In-charge of Amlabad Outpost, he was issued a charge-sheet dated 23.12.2008 for the alleged misconduct for not issuing release order of transfer to one Vishawanth Singh. Similarly, other three police officers In-charge including the petitioner were charge-sheeted for the same misconduct for not relieving the police personnel within 24 hours. It has also averred in the writ application that three police officers In-charge namely Ramlal Ram, Chunmun Singh and the petitioner were charge-sheeted for the same misconduct. In pursuance to the aforesaid charge, inquiry officer was appointed and the inquiry officer submitted the report. On the basis of the inquiry report, the petitioner was found guilty partially and the disciplinary authority on the basis of the inquiry report has imposed punishment dated 31.05.2009 the infliction of punishment of award of black mark. Being aggrieved by the order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority i.e. respondent no. 2 and the appellate authority rejected the appeal vide order dated 15.02.2010 in a very cryptic and non-reasoned manner.
3. Mr. Sidhartha Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently submitted that in the proceeding, no enquiry report supplied to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the disciplinary authority while analysing the inquiry report differed with the findings of the inquiry officer and without assigning reasons for his difference and without giving petitioner any opportunity of hearing has imposed a major punishment of black mark which has grossly vitiated disciplinary proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated employees like Chunmun Singh who was proceeded on the self same charges has been inflicted with the minor punishment of censure so the petitioner is entitled to be extended with the doctrine of parity of punishment so far as the impugned order of punishment is concerned.
4. Mr. Chanchal Jain, learned counsel for the respondents J.C. to A.G. has assiduously advanced his argument by submitting that punishment considering the gravity of charges imposed on petitioner does not warrant interference in the instant case. Learned counsel for the respondents has reiterated the submissions made in the counter-affidavit by advancing in the argument. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per the inquiry proceeding the petitioner has been found partially guilty of the offence therefore the punishment is commensurate to the gravity of charges.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the respective parties at length and on perusal of the records, I am of the considered view that the inquiry report has grossly been prejudiced to the petitioner, which has materially affected the outcome of the departmental proceeding. Moreover, there has been procedural irregularities. Since no second show cause notice had been issued prior to the infliction of punishment. The impugned order of punishment, pertains to awarding of black mark, which is a major punishment. Police Manual in Rule 824 inter alia envisages about the punishment which may be inflicted departmentally on a police officer of an below the rank of Inspector.
"Rule 828 of the Police Manual reads as follows:- Infliction of major punishments-
(a) Of the punishments permitted by rule 824, the items in serials (a) to (f) of that rule shall be regarded as major punishments, and shall be inflicted by an officer not below the rank of Superintendent.
(b) without prejudice to the provision of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.