SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 755

D.N.PATEL, AMITAV K.GUPTA
Hansraj Sardana – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Krishanu Ray.

JUDGMENT :

D.N. PATEL, J.

1. Disputes involved in these matters were referred to before the Mediation Centre, Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority, Nyaya Sadan, Doranda, Ranchi and now during the mediation with the help of counsel for both the sides, the matters have been settled. The mediation report has also been received by this Court, which is on record. The terms and conditions of the compromise arrived at between the parties are as under:-

(i) It has also been reiterated that the disputes have been settled amicably and requested to fix the case on 28.3.2016 for submission of the compromise petition with terms and conditions of settlement arrived between the parties.

(ii) On 28.3.2016, today the learned Counsels of both the parties produced the compromise petition in photocopy arrived between the parties mentioning the terms of settlement executed on non-judicial stamp on 23rd of March, 2016. By the terms of settlement mentioned in para-3 of the settlement, the Appellant Hansraj Sardana has to pay a sum of Rs. 9,80,159.00 only towards full and final settlement of arrears



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top