SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Jhk) 1418

S.N.PATHAK
Sahzad Alam – Appellant
Versus
Central Coalfield Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar
For the C.C.L. : Mr. H.P. Singh

ORDER :

Heard the parties.

2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for quashing the letter contained in reference no.PO/GW/P/9.3.0/16 dated 05.04.2016 whereby the petitioner has been disqualified for the compassionate appointment on the ground that the age of the petitioner is more than 35 years.

3. The factual exposition, as has been delineated in the writ petition, is that the father of the petitioner was appointed on 27.04.1994 under respondent no.1 on the post of P.R. Grade-III, who died in harness on 30.10.2014. Thereafter, petitioner's mother had informed the respondent no.3 regarding the death of her husband on 06.11.2014. Subsequently, the petitioner had made an application on 01.01.2015 for his employment on the ground of compassionate appointment. Thereafter, the petitioner was directed to appear with all the required documents before the Committee on 04.02.2015 alongwith all the family members. All the family members have given consent for appointment. Unit level Screening Committee-respondent no.4 forwarded all the relevant documents of the petitioner including affidavit to the Staff Officer, Sirka on 27.07.2015 for considering employment of the petitioner. Thereaf










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top